Centralized log aggregation
Collect security logs into a shared investigation workspace instead of searching each source separately.
Products
Rasid SIEM
Bring the evidence into one investigation view.
Rasid SIEM connects relevant events from different systems with the analyst who must assess them. Time, source and context affect whether a signal can be investigated. Start with meaningful detection questions, then agree collection, review and retention around the evidence the response team actually needs.
Collecting logs is only the beginning of a security monitoring workflow.
Inside the workspace
Rasid SIEM: a closer look
Explore how the product could bring its tools and working records into one view. Review the workflow design during your product walkthrough.
Features & client solutions
What this helps your team solve
Connect each capability to a day-to-day task and a practical result your team can evaluate.
Real-time event correlation
Correlate related events to help analysts recognize activity that spans multiple systems.
Anomaly & threat detection
Surface suspicious patterns for analyst triage with the evidence needed for follow-up.
Bring one example from your daily work. We can review the records involved, who owns each step and which integrations are needed before defining the implementation scope.
Discuss your workflowProduct fit
Rasid SIEM for the way your team works
A SIEM configuration connects relevant events with review rules and investigation context. Source quality and analyst ownership determine whether an alert becomes a useful action.
Areas to assess in a walkthrough
- Centralized log aggregation
- Real-time event correlation
- Anomaly & threat detection
- Customizable alert rules
- Reporting requirements and evidence retention
In practice
Rasid SIEM: a practical example
Follow one relevant event from its source into a review queue. Check the timestamps, context and person responsible for investigation. Agree useful detections and retention requirements before treating every collected log as meaningful coverage.
An illustrative scenario to discuss when planning your project.From records to decisions
How your team works with Rasid SIEM
The people involved include security analysts, incident responders and system owners. Begin with a small, representative set of log sources, event formats, detection rules and evidence retention needs, then identify the decision or action each role needs to complete. This helps shape a useful first release and avoids collecting information that nobody uses.
Connect a finding to a responsible next action.
Useful security operations link a signal or policy decision to evidence, an owner and a response process. Agree the authorized scope, review permissions and handling of exceptions. Include benign activity in evaluation as well as controlled test events, so the team can assess the practical review workload.
Implementation approach01 02 03 04
From agreed scope to everyday use
Review the starting point
Identify the current sources of log sources, event formats, detection rules and evidence retention needs. Check data quality, shared references and required fields before agreeing what will be migrated, connected or recreated.
Define roles and connections
Review the needs of security analysts, incident responders and system owners. Document permissions, required integrations, the authoritative system for each record and what happens when information cannot be exchanged.
Test an end-to-end case
Use safe sample data to correlate a test event across sources and retain the evidence needed for investigation. Agree expected results, review exceptions and record acceptance decisions before widening access.
Prepare the operational handover
Name the configuration owner, change decision-maker and support contact. Plan training and documentation around ordinary tasks, then review early use under the agreed support arrangement.
Practical details
Questions before getting started
What should we bring to the first walkthrough?
Prepare examples of log sources, event formats, detection rules and evidence retention needs, with confidential details removed. Explain the step that takes the most effort or causes confusion, and identify who needs to review the result.
How do we decide whether it fits our work?
We define a scenario that lets your team correlate a test event across sources and retain the evidence needed for investigation. Compare the result with the current process and document requirements and gaps before approving the implementation scope.
Can it connect to our existing systems?
The required systems and data sources are reviewed first. The integration plan covers access, field mapping, transfer timing and responsibility for errors. The proposal identifies included connections and any custom work needed.
How are pricing and support agreed?
The proposal considers features, users or workload, the operating environment, integrations and migration. Training, operational ownership and the support arrangement are agreed alongside the implementation scope.