Application performance monitoring
See application response times and failure patterns before investigating individual requests.
Products
Nabd Tools
See the service's pulse in its working context.
Nabd Tools brings measurements closer to the task users are trying to complete. A service may still return successful requests while becoming too slow to use. Define a useful baseline, inspect the measurements that reveal the effect and agree how the team reviews a change in normal operating behaviour.
Individual monitoring tools should support a shared operating view.
Inside the workspace
Nabd Tools: a closer look
Explore how the product could bring its tools and working records into one view. Review the workflow design during your product walkthrough.
Features & client solutions
What this helps your team solve
Connect each capability to a day-to-day task and a practical result your team can evaluate.
Error tracking & alerting
Group errors and route alerts so developers can prioritize recurring faults.
Distributed tracing
Follow a request across services to identify where a distributed transaction slows or fails.
Bring one example from your daily work. We can review the records involved, who owns each step and which integrations are needed before defining the implementation scope.
Discuss your workflowProduct fit
Nabd Tools for the way your team works
We discuss what each tool measures, how the result is interpreted and where it sends an alert, so teams do not receive overlapping messages with no clear owner.
Areas to assess in a walkthrough
- Application performance monitoring
- Error tracking & alerting
- Distributed tracing
- Custom metric dashboards
- Integration with alerting tools
In practice
Nabd Tools: a practical example
Inspect a service that is responding slowly while still returning successful requests. Review whether the measurements show the user impact. Set thresholds around an agreed operating baseline and identify who maintains them.
An illustrative scenario to discuss when planning your project.From records to decisions
How your team works with Nabd Tools
The people involved include application developers, reliability engineers and support staff. Begin with a small, representative set of application services, error samples, trace identifiers and alert destinations, then identify the decision or action each role needs to complete. This helps shape a useful first release and avoids collecting information that nobody uses.
Plan who operates the system after launch.
A working setup needs more than a successful first deployment. Agree access, environment boundaries, monitoring, recovery and change ownership. Review a normal operation and an interrupted one before handover, with clear instructions for diagnosing the issue and deciding whether to retry, restore or roll back.
Implementation approach01 02 03 04
From agreed scope to everyday use
Review the starting point
Identify the current sources of application services, error samples, trace identifiers and alert destinations. Check data quality, shared references and required fields before agreeing what will be migrated, connected or recreated.
Define roles and connections
Review the needs of application developers, reliability engineers and support staff. Document permissions, required integrations, the authoritative system for each record and what happens when information cannot be exchanged.
Test an end-to-end case
Use safe sample data to follow a slow request across services and link its failure to the relevant logs. Agree expected results, review exceptions and record acceptance decisions before widening access.
Prepare the operational handover
Name the configuration owner, change decision-maker and support contact. Plan training and documentation around ordinary tasks, then review early use under the agreed support arrangement.
Practical details
Questions before getting started
What should we bring to the first walkthrough?
Prepare examples of application services, error samples, trace identifiers and alert destinations, with confidential details removed. Explain the step that takes the most effort or causes confusion, and identify who needs to review the result.
How do we decide whether it fits our work?
We define a scenario that lets your team follow a slow request across services and link its failure to the relevant logs. Compare the result with the current process and document requirements and gaps before approving the implementation scope.
Can it connect to our existing systems?
The required systems and data sources are reviewed first. The integration plan covers access, field mapping, transfer timing and responsibility for errors. The proposal identifies included connections and any custom work needed.
How are pricing and support agreed?
The proposal considers features, users or workload, the operating environment, integrations and migration. Training, operational ownership and the support arrangement are agreed alongside the implementation scope.