Advanced spam & phishing filtering
Filter suspected spam and phishing messages before users act on them.
Products
Barid Secure
Connect the technical rules with the user's response.
Barid Secure brings suspicious-message handling and staff reporting into one email-security discussion. Blocking alone does not explain what a user should do next. Review accepted mail, false blocks and reported messages, with an agreed owner for investigation and a clear route for resolving legitimate delivery problems.
Email protection combines technical controls with a practical route for staff to report suspicious messages.
Inside the workspace
Barid Secure: a closer look
Explore how the product could bring its tools and working records into one view. Review the workflow design during your product walkthrough.
Features & client solutions
What this helps your team solve
Connect each capability to a day-to-day task and a practical result your team can evaluate.
Attachment sandboxing
Inspect suspicious attachments in the agreed analysis workflow before release.
DMARC/SPF/DKIM enforcement
Review sender-authentication policies to reduce messages that impersonate your domain.
Bring one example from your daily work. We can review the records involved, who owns each step and which integrations are needed before defining the implementation scope.
Discuss your workflowProduct fit
Barid Secure for the way your team works
Configuration should fit mail flow and account permissions, with review of quarantined mail and legitimate delivery problems.
Areas to assess in a walkthrough
- Advanced spam & phishing filtering
- Attachment sandboxing
- DMARC/SPF/DKIM enforcement
- Business email compromise protection
- Quarantine management
In practice
Barid Secure: a practical example
Test how a suspicious message is handled and how a user reports one that reaches their inbox. Agree the review process for blocked legitimate mail. Staff instructions and technical rules need to work together.
An illustrative scenario to discuss when planning your project.From records to decisions
How your team works with Barid Secure
The people involved include mail administrators, security teams and support reviewers. Begin with a small, representative set of mail domains, sender policies, quarantine rules and review responsibilities, then identify the decision or action each role needs to complete. This helps shape a useful first release and avoids collecting information that nobody uses.
Connect a finding to a responsible next action.
Useful security operations link a signal or policy decision to evidence, an owner and a response process. Agree the authorized scope, review permissions and handling of exceptions. Include benign activity in evaluation as well as controlled test events, so the team can assess the practical review workload.
Implementation approach01 02 03 04
From agreed scope to everyday use
Review the starting point
Identify the current sources of mail domains, sender policies, quarantine rules and review responsibilities. Check data quality, shared references and required fields before agreeing what will be migrated, connected or recreated.
Define roles and connections
Review the needs of mail administrators, security teams and support reviewers. Document permissions, required integrations, the authoritative system for each record and what happens when information cannot be exchanged.
Test an end-to-end case
Use safe sample data to route a suspicious test message to review while allowing a legitimate message through. Agree expected results, review exceptions and record acceptance decisions before widening access.
Prepare the operational handover
Name the configuration owner, change decision-maker and support contact. Plan training and documentation around ordinary tasks, then review early use under the agreed support arrangement.
Practical details
Questions before getting started
What should we bring to the first walkthrough?
Prepare examples of mail domains, sender policies, quarantine rules and review responsibilities, with confidential details removed. Explain the step that takes the most effort or causes confusion, and identify who needs to review the result.
How do we decide whether it fits our work?
We define a scenario that lets your team route a suspicious test message to review while allowing a legitimate message through. Compare the result with the current process and document requirements and gaps before approving the implementation scope.
Can it connect to our existing systems?
The required systems and data sources are reviewed first. The integration plan covers access, field mapping, transfer timing and responsibility for errors. The proposal identifies included connections and any custom work needed.
How are pricing and support agreed?
The proposal considers features, users or workload, the operating environment, integrations and migration. Training, operational ownership and the support arrangement are agreed alongside the implementation scope.